| "body"> | | | | come with up to six slots. So it will bind up to 48 |
| Why Thermal Binders Instead of Comb Binders? | | | | documents at once! |
| Thermal Binders vs. Comb Binders- Integrity & | | | | Thermal Binders vs. Comb Binders- Editing Ability |
| Strength | | | | Up until now, the only editable system was comb |
| Let's start with the pages themselves. With comb | | | | binders. But Unibind's patented technology allows you |
| binders, the page's integrity is compromised by the | | | | to edit your documents over and over again. As a |
| holes you have to punch. Even if you order them | | | | matter of fact, editing a document is even easier with |
| pre-punched, that part of the paper has only half the | | | | Unibinds thermal binders than with comb binders. |
| strength of the rest of the page. If you expect your | | | | Because you don't have to worry about the pages |
| documents to last for any length of time, then thermal | | | | coming out of line. |
| binders are the way to go. The pages are held with a | | | | With comb binders, the edges around the punched |
| simple strip of glue and nothing more. | | | | holes begin to frey after time and frequent use. So it's |
| Unibind's thermal binders are unique, in that they use a | | | | even more difficult to edit. With thermal binders, the |
| patented resign that doesn't even require you to score | | | | edges of the page are always protected by the |
| the page ends. It's truly the strongest thermal binding | | | | spine...so they never wear out. |
| system today. And each of the spines has a strip of | | | | Thermal Binders vs. Comb Binders- Equipment and |
| steel in them to strengthen the folder's form. | | | | Supplies |
| Thermal Binders vs. Comb Binders- Time | | | | Comb binders require 2 pieces of equipment...hole |
| It takes time to punch holes in your pages...the ones | | | | punchers and comb inserters. But with thermal binders, |
| necessary for comb binders. If you have three or | | | | you only need one piece of equipment. And the |
| more documents to bind, this time can add up fast. | | | | thermal binders are less complicated and easier to use. |
| Especially if you run a copy center and have to pay | | | | Just lay the folder in the machine and wait. |
| someone to do it. Thermal binders don't require holes, | | | | With Unibind's thermal binders, you don't even have to |
| so you won't waste any time at all. | | | | turn the machine on. It automatically detects the folder |
| On top of all that, you have to line the documents up | | | | and starts its heating cycle. When the light turns green, |
| twice...once to punch the holes and once to insert the | | | | you know it's finished and all you have to do is take |
| combs. And that's only if you have equipment that will | | | | the document out and let it cool. |
| punch a large stack at once. If you're using the | | | | Supplies for thermal binders are more and more |
| cheaper comb binders, you can only punch holes in a | | | | common as the industry develops. Until recently, comb |
| small stack...so binding one single document can take | | | | binders were preferred over thermal binders because |
| up to fifteen minutes. | | | | thermal bound documents couldn't lay as flat. But |
| Thermal binders eliminate this step entirely. You just line | | | | recent developments from Unibind make it possible to |
| the sheets up and put them in the folder. Once you lay | | | | lay the document flat without having to crease the |
| the folder in the binder, it does the rest for you. And it | | | | folder and pages. |
| finished in just three minutes. | | | | Unibind's thermal binding folders have a strengthened |
| The Unibind thermal binder saves even more time | | | | crease just at the spine, so they open easily without |
| because you can fit up to eight documents in the | | | | wearing and tearing. |
| machine's slot...and their high volume thermal binders | | | | |