| > | | | | because you can fit up to eight documents in the |
| | | | machine’s slot
and their high volume thermal |
| Integrity & strength, time, editing ability, and cost of | | | | binders come with up to six slots. So it will bind up to |
| equipment and supplies...thermal binding wins in every | | | | 48 documents at once! |
| aspect. | | | | Thermal Binders vs. Comb Binders— Editing |
| Why Thermal Binders Instead of Comb Binders? | | | | Ability |
| Thermal Binders vs. Comb Binders— Integrity & | | | | Up until now, the only editable system was comb |
| Strength | | | | binders. But Unibind’s patented technology |
| Let’s start with the pages themselves. With | | | | allows you to edit your documents over and over |
| comb binders, the page’s integrity is | | | | again. As a matter of fact, editing a document is even |
| compromised by the holes you have to punch. Even if | | | | easier with Unibinds thermal binders than with comb |
| you order them pre-punched, that part of the paper | | | | binders. Because you don’t have to worry |
| has only half the strength of the rest of the page. If | | | | about the pages coming out of line. |
| you expect your documents to last for any length of | | | | With comb binders, the edges around the punched |
| time, then thermal binders are the way to go. The | | | | holes begin to frey after time and frequent use. So |
| pages are held with a simple strip of glue and nothing | | | | it’s even more difficult to edit. With thermal |
| more. | | | | binders, the edges of the page are always protected |
| Unibind’s thermal binders are unique, in that they | | | | by the spine
so they never wear out. |
| use a patented resign that doesn’t even require | | | | Thermal Binders vs. Comb Binders— Equipment |
| you to score the page ends. It’s truly the | | | | and Supplies |
| strongest thermal binding system today. And each of | | | | Comb binders require 2 pieces of equipment
hole |
| the spines has a strip of steel in them to strengthen | | | | punchers and comb inserters. But with thermal binders, |
| the folder’s form. | | | | you only need one piece of equipment. And the |
| Thermal Binders vs. Comb Binders— Time | | | | thermal binders are less complicated and easier to use. |
| It takes time to punch holes in your pages
the ones | | | | Just lay the folder in the machine and wait. |
| necessary for comb binders. If you have three or | | | | With Unibind’s thermal binders, you don’t |
| more documents to bind, this time can add up fast. | | | | even have to turn the machine on. It automatically |
| Especially if you run a copy center and have to pay | | | | detects the folder and starts its heating cycle. When |
| someone to do it. Thermal binders don't require holes, | | | | the light turns green, you know it’s finished and |
| so you won't waste any time at all. | | | | all you have to do is take the document out and let it |
| On top of all that, you have to line the documents up | | | | cool. |
| twice
once to punch the holes and once to insert | | | | Supplies for thermal binders are more and more |
| the combs. And that’s only if you have | | | | common as the industry develops. Until recently, comb |
| equipment that will punch a large stack at once. If | | | | binders were preferred over thermal binders because |
| you’re using the cheaper comb binders, you can | | | | thermal bound documents couldn’t lay as flat. |
| only punch holes in a small stack
so binding one | | | | But recent developments from Unibind make it possible |
| single document can take up to fifteen minutes. | | | | to lay the document flat without having to crease the |
| Thermal binders eliminate this step entirely. You just line | | | | folder and pages. |
| the sheets up and put them in the folder. Once you lay | | | | Unibind’s thermal binding folders have a |
| the folder in the binder, it does the rest for you. And it | | | | strengthened crease just at the spine, so they open |
| finished in just three minutes. | | | | easily without wearing and tearing. |
| The Unibind thermal binder saves even more time | | | | |